All joking aside about a gridlocked Congress, real progress has been made this week on flood risk reduction authorizations and appropriations.  As explained below, it is looking like the 2018 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) may pass shortly, and the relevant budget subcommittees are ready to move an agreed-upon appropriations packet forward to their respective floors as well.  Also, Congress appears to have put a nail in the coffin for any proposal to move USACE to a different Federal department.

Sometimes Congress can move so fast (not often, but sometimes), that the various catalogues of their actions aren’t yet caught up.  We use an app on our phones to track legislation.  And if you pull up S.3021 on our phones it claims the bill is “to designate the United States courthouse located at 300 South Fourth Street in Minneapolis, Minnesota, as the ‘Diana E. Murphy United States Courthouse’.”  But actually, this is our new WRDA for 2018, entitled the “America’s Water Infrastructure Act of 2018.’’  Our legislators were proud to put this forth, as well they should; this would be the third-in-a-row for the attempted biennial schedule.

Title I authorizes proposed USACE civil works activities for port, waterway, flood protection, and other water infrastructure improvements for the country.  Title II seeks to bring greater investment in and modernization of the country’s aging drinking water infrastructure.  Title III encourages the use of clean, baseload hydropower by streamlining the burdensome regulatory approval process. Title IV addresses stormwater and wastewater infrastructure improvements, and reauthorizes and strengthens the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) program.

In other news an FY 2019 Energy and Water funding bill was agreed to by House & Senate negotiators (agreed to but still in draft form), all but assuring it will pass Congress and be signed by the president, with any luck by the end of the month.  Some of the key elements of the bill are:

  • Not later than 60 days after the enactment of this Act, USACE shall provide to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress a work plan…   This could mean that we will see a workplan as early as Dec 1 this year, which would be the earliest in years.
  • The agreement includes six new starts in the Investigations account and five new starts in the Construction account to be distributed across the authorized mission areas of the USACE.
  • General Investigations Account funding: USACE will have $43 million over the President’s budget to allocate in the FY19 Work Plan under the GI account
  • Construction Account funding: USACE will have $1.311 billion over the President’s budget to allocate in the FY19 Work Plan under the Construction account.
  • Finally, the measure continues to reiterate to USACE that no new start or new investment decision shall be required when moving from feasibility to preconstruction engineering and design (PED).

Interestingly, and importantly, the bill also prohibits the use of any federal funds for reorganizing USACE out of the Department of Defense. Here is the bill language, and here is the report language explaining the basis of not funding the effort.

Photo of Scott L. Shapiro Scott L. Shapiro

Scott Shapiro is known for his expertise in flood protection improvement projects throughout California’s Central Valley.
He is helping clients with more than a billion dollars in projects in California’s Central Valley and issues involving the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the…

Scott Shapiro is known for his expertise in flood protection improvement projects throughout California’s Central Valley.
He is helping clients with more than a billion dollars in projects in California’s Central Valley and issues involving the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) throughout the Western United States.

With a special focus on massive flood protection improvement projects, Scott advises clients through regulatory, contractual, financing, and legislative challenges. Acting as general or special counsel, he regularly interacts with senior management at USACE (Headquarters, South Pacific Division, and Sacramento District), the California Department of Water Resources, and the Central Valley Flood Protection Board. He was named to the National Section 408 Task Force and has been invited to give testimony to the National Academies. Scott was instrumental in helping the first regional flood improvement agency that took a basin threatened by flood risk from less than 30-year level of protection to a level of protection approaching 200-year.

Having worked with FEMA on issues of floodplain mapping and levee accreditation for many years, Scott has developed collaborative environments in which he fosters win-win solutions for his clients. He is also currently serving as the lead counsel on a flood insurance rate map (FIRM) appeal and has drafted Federal legislation to modify the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) several times.

Scott is known throughout the region for his extensive litigation experience focusing on cases arising from levee failures. He has litigated levee failures resulting from underseepage, failed encroachments, and rodent burrows as well as briefing levee overtopping cases at the appellate level. Scott is one of the few attorneys with experience litigating flood cases on behalf of plaintiffs as well as defendant government entities.

Photo of Andrea P. Clark Andrea P. Clark

Andrea Clark specializes in water rights and flood control, serving as general counsel to a variety of public agencies from local reclamation districts and water districts to regional joint powers authorities.

Public agencies in the water and flood control fields rely on Andrea…

Andrea Clark specializes in water rights and flood control, serving as general counsel to a variety of public agencies from local reclamation districts and water districts to regional joint powers authorities.

Public agencies in the water and flood control fields rely on Andrea for her ability to explain in understandable terms the wide range of issues impacting them, including basic transparency laws (Brown Act and Public Records Act), public bidding and contracting, bond financing, the unique nature of joint powers authorities, and elections. She also regularly counsels clients on water transfers, Proposition 218 compliance, the California Environmental Quality Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and financing strategies for major capital improvement projects.

With a special expertise in flood control and floodplain management, Andrea is regularly asked to speak on topics ranging from flood insurance to climate change and the future of flood control policy in California. Through her representation of clients in state flood policy and speaking engagements, she has forged strong relationships with key members of the flood control community in California.

Andrea also counsels private clients, including landowners and mutual water companies, on water supply matters, including proceedings before the State Water Resources Control Board, water rights determinations, and contractual disputes with Federal agencies.