On Monday, June 9, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) opened a short, 30-day public comment period soliciting information and comments to, “improve the overall efficiency and effectiveness” of Section 10(a) take permitting under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). If it seems like Section 10(a) just underwent a comment period not too long ago, that’s because it did. In 2023, under the Biden Administration, FWS solicited comments on proposed revisions to the regulations implementing that section, which were finalized last April. Now, the Trump Administration is seeking suggestions on how to further revise its ESA permitting rules.

The April 2024 rule revisions created a new type of agreement, called a “conservation benefit agreement,” that combines both safe harbor agreements and candidate conservation agreements under Section10(a)(1)(A) of the ESA to facilitate voluntary conservation of not-yet-listed species on non-federal lands. This change was made in an effort to reduce costs and time associated with the permit processes and to encourage further participation in these voluntary programs.

With this new request for information and feedback, the FWS is taking a different approach. Instead of drafting revisions and asking stakeholders to provide feedback on the expected efficacy of those revisions, FWS is asking for feedback from stakeholders first, before proposing any specific rule revisions. The scope of this request includes the newly created conservation benefit agreements as well as habitat conservation plans and associated incidental take permits for listed species under ESA Section 10(a)(1)(B). Specifically, the FWS notice solicits information and suggestions from stakeholders on the following topics:

  1. barriers that prevent applicants from pursuing development of conservation benefit agreements and habitat conservation plans;
  2. methods to streamline conservation benefit agreement and habitat conservation plan development and their associated permit issuance;
  3. strategies to enhance FWS communications on conservation benefit agreements, habitat conservation plans, and their associated permits;
  4. whether any clarification is needed on the roles and responsibilities of the FWS and applicants during conservation benefit agreement and habitat conservation plan development and permit issuance;
  5. funding and resources necessary to develop and implement conservation benefit agreements and habitat conservation plans;
  6. strategies the FWS could pilot to improve the overall effectiveness of the Section 10(a) program.

This request for information follows on the heels of a broader request issued by the Department of the Interior (Interior) on May 16, seeking public input on potential regulatory revisions for Interior-issued regulations. That request encompasses the broader ESA implementation regulations. The comment period for that initial request for information closes on June 20, 2025.

With an Administration actively pursuing permitting reform and seeking ways to reduce regulatory burdens on industry, this solicitation is a prime opportunity to provide feedback and suggestions for meaningful reform of the often cumbersome and lengthy ESA permitting process.

Photo of Ben Cowan Ben Cowan

Ben’s innovative solutions under the Endangered Species Act and other wildlife statutes have enabled renewable energy companies to drive major projects forward.

Photo of Shawn Zovod Shawn Zovod

Shawn practices environmental and natural resources law and strategy. She specializes in Clean Water Act (CWA), Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, Endangered Species Act (ESA), Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) permitting, as well as the preparation of…

Shawn practices environmental and natural resources law and strategy. She specializes in Clean Water Act (CWA), Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, Endangered Species Act (ESA), Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) permitting, as well as the preparation of environmental documents under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Photo of Viktoriia De Las Casas Viktoriia De Las Casas

Viktoriia assists clients in complying with environmental laws and regulations, including permitting and strategizing on implementation of environmental requirements. She also represents them in litigation matters and advises on various aspects of environmental due diligence. Her practice encompasses all of the major environmental…

Viktoriia assists clients in complying with environmental laws and regulations, including permitting and strategizing on implementation of environmental requirements. She also represents them in litigation matters and advises on various aspects of environmental due diligence. Her practice encompasses all of the major environmental statutes, including the Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, Clean Air Act, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, and corresponding regulations.

Photo of Kassie Smith Kassie Smith

Kassie supports attorneys in the firm’s Environmental practice through due diligence, as well as management and development of environmentally impacted properties. Kassie also assists in the evaluation of environmental risk factors and strategies for nationwide client operations in order to promote compliance with…

Kassie supports attorneys in the firm’s Environmental practice through due diligence, as well as management and development of environmentally impacted properties. Kassie also assists in the evaluation of environmental risk factors and strategies for nationwide client operations in order to promote compliance with federal, state, and local regulations.

Photo of Stephanie Collins Stephanie Collins

Stephanie supports the attorneys of the firm’s Environmental practice through environmental policy development, project management, regulatory compliance, and due diligence. She is an experienced environmental professional with more than 10 years of experience in NEPA review and permitting for complex construction projects.