Seyfarth Synopsis: On Thursday, June 5, 2025, OSHA Nominee David Keeling testified that he plans to adopt a more cooperative, proactive approach and pursue a new workplace violence regulation.

As we previously blogged, on February 11, 2025, President Trump nominated David Keeling as Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA, pending Senate confirmation. In the first Trump Administration, the OSHA nominee was never put to a Senate confirmation vote and the position was left vacant. 

Mr. Keeling has extensive experience in occupational safety from his tenure at two major logistics companies.  If confirmed in the position, we expected Mr. Keeling to adopt pro-employer positions and modernize workplace safety standards and regulations. The Senate has begun to assess Mr. Keeling’s nomination.  On June 5, 2025, Mr. Keeling testified before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, outlining his vision for workplace safety.

1. Modernization of Injury and Illness Prevention

Mr. Keeling outlined an intent to shift the focus at OSHA toward proactive injury prevention (rather than post-accident enforcement). To accomplish this, he advocated “to greatly accelerate the pace of modernization in the area of Regulatory Oversight and Rulemaking” centered on injury prevention and informed design, helping workplaces eliminate hazards before they lead to harm. Mr. Keeling  plans to harness and promote the use of predictive analytics to enhance onsite safety efforts. By utilizing data-driven insights, and moving past OSHA’s existing standards that “have become antiquated or unusable in the face of job modernization or technological advancements,” OSHA and employers could anticipate risks, prevent incidents, and tailor safety measures more effectively.

2. Collaboration and Cooperation within the Industry

Mr. Keeling emphasized expanded collaboration with employers, including with OSHA cooperative programs and industry alliances, to achieve employee safety. “We must move beyond existing silos and self-imposed barriers to achieve real improvement.”  Another priority is to “modernize and update existing Voluntary Protection Programs,” as the current programs provide a platform to work off of but are not enough to obtain successful outcomes in employee safety.

3. OSHA’s Enforcement Transformation

Mr. Keeling again displayed his intention towards relying on technology and data that exist today, which were not available when most OSHA standards were promulgated.  Mr. Keeling wants to enhance areas of workplace safety by harnessing existing data “to greatly enhance onsite safety efforts through predictive analytics.”  Mr. Keeling further stated that OSHA must engage “at-risk employers and employees through proactive risk mitigation and reduction programs before a worksite tragedy has taken place or a fatality has occurred.”

4. Workplace Violence Standard

Mr. Keeling also displayed a commitment towards continuity and proactive regulation of developing areas of workplace safety and health law.  Mr. Keeling committed to issuing a standard aimed at addressing workplace violence, a hazard currently addressed through OSHA’s use of the General Duty Clause (particularly in health care), and highlights OSHA’s growing concerns about exposures to workplace violence and gun violence.

As Mr. Keeling’s nomination progresses, these priorities will shape discussions on the future of workplace safety regulations and enforcement. If confirmed, his leadership could mark a significant shift in OSHA’s approach—moving beyond traditional enforcement into a more modern, dynamic, and prevention-driven era.

Photo of Benjamin D. Briggs Benjamin D. Briggs

Benjamin is a partner in the Labor & Employment Practice Group of Seyfarth Shaw LLP.  His practice focuses on representing and counseling employers in employment matters arising under federal and state laws.  Mr. Briggs has represented clients in jurisdictions across the U.S. in…

Benjamin is a partner in the Labor & Employment Practice Group of Seyfarth Shaw LLP.  His practice focuses on representing and counseling employers in employment matters arising under federal and state laws.  Mr. Briggs has represented clients in jurisdictions across the U.S. in complex class and collective action wage-hour litigation, U.S. Department of Labor wage-hour audits, workplace discrimination, harassment and retaliation litigation and administrative proceedings, whistleblower actions, workplace safety and health (OSHA) matters and litigation involving trade secrets and non-compete agreements. Mr. Briggs routinely counsels employers on compliance with the full range of federal and state employment laws and devotes a significant portion of his practice to assisting employers with wage-hour compliance matters, including internal pay practice and classification assessments.

Mr. Briggs has represented and counseled employers from industries including staffing services, building and consumer products, technology, environmental, retail, automotive, distribution, utilities, restaurant and hospitality, defense contracting, construction, healthcare and media.