Earlier this month, in Lewis v. United States the 5th Circuit issued a decision interpreting the Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett v. EPA. The 5th Circuit decision is a model of clarity and demonstrates what I’ll call the good side of Sackett. And clarity is definitely the right word here. One might say clarity
More Posts
More Litigation Concerning Plastic Pollution: Can Claims Be Both Novel and Traditional at the Same Time?
Another Study Regarding the Health Impacts of PM Emissions From Power Plants: What Impact Will It Have On Regulation and Litigation?
Is Litigation the Solution to Plastic Pollution?
What Will Be the Real Consequences of an EPA Decision to List PFAS as Hazardous Substances Under CERCLA?
Oil and Hazardous Substances; Never the Twain Shall Meet
Chevron Is (Still) Not a Left-Wing Plot
Establishing Standing in Citizen Suits Under the Clean Air Act: Breathing Polluted Air May Not Suffice
Does EPA Have Authority to Promulgate Cumulative Risk Assessment Guidance?
EPA Must Consult With Other Agencies Before Issuing Water Quality Criteria: Is This an Example of Congressional Use of Behavioral Economics?
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org