Uncategorized

In Parker Shattuck Neighbors, et al. v. Berkeley City Council, et. al. (First Appellate District, December 30, 2013) (“Shattuck Neighbors”), the court upheld the City of Berkeley’s approval of a mitigated negative declaration (“MND”) for a residential infill project. The court found no Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) was necessary because the expert opinion upon which

If you know contaminated industrial property would be worth $X clean, what is the proper way to value the contamination?  Maybe it is just the “cost to cure,” but that does not capture any “stigma” that may stay with the property.  And then there is a wrinkle if the property is the subject of an agreement

In June, we wrote about the Obama Administration increasing the Social Cost of Carbon.  Predictably, people were unhappy about being informed of the increase through a regulatory impact analysis that dealt with energy efficiency standards for microwave ovens.  The lackluster reveal attracted so much attention that the Obama Administration recently announced that it will provide

The Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) has issued a report criticizing the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (“CMS”) and its Recovery Audit Contractor (“RAC”) Program. In a report issued on September 4, 2013, the OIG determined that CMS need to take corrective action on

Fed up with USEPA’s “sue and settle” rulemaking tactics, the regulated community’s complaints have resulted in increased scrutiny of the practice by members of Congress and state officials and has even resulted in recent litigation.  Our prior article details the specifics of USEPA’s “sue and settle” rulemaking practices, but in essence, it is where USEPA has been sued (or